<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: iPod Touch &#8211; nothing to do with the iPod</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communityguy.com/1022/ipod-touch-nothing-to-do-with-an-ipod/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communityguy.com/1022/ipod-touch-nothing-to-do-with-an-ipod/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:26:22 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brooks</title>
		<link>http://www.communityguy.com/1022/ipod-touch-nothing-to-do-with-an-ipod/comment-page-1/#comment-2778</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 18:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communityguy.com/1022/ipod-touch-nothing-to-do-with-an-ipod/#comment-2778</guid>
		<description>Bummer thing about this device are the things &quot;not&quot; included. Calendar exists but in the same method as existing iPods. This means that you can&#039;t enter a new entry. Say, wha...

There is no support for Notes. No biggie, but silly when you think about it. 

Guess what? No email. 

I&#039;m sure it will get hacked in but the the whole selling point for me would have been the iPhone w/o the phone. I don&#039;t really want/need the phone, but the other services would have sold me. I&#039;m sure that is all part of the selling strategy. 

I&#039;m like you with tons of content, but I like shaking mine up without having everything at my fingertips. Too much stuff to wade through for my taste. I&#039;ll stick to my shuffle and cell phone combo for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bummer thing about this device are the things &#8220;not&#8221; included. Calendar exists but in the same method as existing iPods. This means that you can&#8217;t enter a new entry. Say, wha&#8230;</p>
<p>There is no support for Notes. No biggie, but silly when you think about it. </p>
<p>Guess what? No email. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure it will get hacked in but the the whole selling point for me would have been the iPhone w/o the phone. I don&#8217;t really want/need the phone, but the other services would have sold me. I&#8217;m sure that is all part of the selling strategy. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m like you with tons of content, but I like shaking mine up without having everything at my fingertips. Too much stuff to wade through for my taste. I&#8217;ll stick to my shuffle and cell phone combo for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brooks</title>
		<link>http://www.communityguy.com/1022/ipod-touch-nothing-to-do-with-an-ipod/comment-page-1/#comment-36255</link>
		<dc:creator>Brooks</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 17:41:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communityguy.com/1022/ipod-touch-nothing-to-do-with-an-ipod/#comment-36255</guid>
		<description>Bummer thing about this device are the things &quot;not&quot; included. Calendar exists but in the same method as existing iPods. This means that you can&#039;t enter a new entry. Say, wha...&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;There is no support for Notes. No biggie, but silly when you think about it. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Guess what? No email. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m sure it will get hacked in but the the whole selling point for me would have been the iPhone w/o the phone. I don&#039;t really want/need the phone, but the other services would have sold me. I&#039;m sure that is all part of the selling strategy. &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I&#039;m like you with tons of content, but I like shaking mine up without having everything at my fingertips. Too much stuff to wade through for my taste. I&#039;ll stick to my shuffle and cell phone combo for now.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bummer thing about this device are the things &#8220;not&#8221; included. Calendar exists but in the same method as existing iPods. This means that you can&#8217;t enter a new entry. Say, wha&#8230;</p>
<p>There is no support for Notes. No biggie, but silly when you think about it. </p>
<p>Guess what? No email. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m sure it will get hacked in but the the whole selling point for me would have been the iPhone w/o the phone. I don&#8217;t really want/need the phone, but the other services would have sold me. I&#8217;m sure that is all part of the selling strategy. </p>
<p>I&#8217;m like you with tons of content, but I like shaking mine up without having everything at my fingertips. Too much stuff to wade through for my taste. I&#8217;ll stick to my shuffle and cell phone combo for now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew J</title>
		<link>http://www.communityguy.com/1022/ipod-touch-nothing-to-do-with-an-ipod/comment-page-1/#comment-2739</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 13:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communityguy.com/1022/ipod-touch-nothing-to-do-with-an-ipod/#comment-2739</guid>
		<description>Jake, thanks for this article, you hit it right on the nose - this is a PDA.  I have to say that the iPod touch is exactly what I have been wanting for several reasons.

1) As a web (and mobile-web) developer I am always running my websites on different devices for testing and development.

2) Being able to use the iPhone interface without having to get a new Cingular contract is awesome (I am still in a 2-year contract with Verizon).

3) I have a 30GB iPod Video and is it about 75% full (15% of that videos).  I have never really liked watching videos on the 2 1/2&quot; screen with the iTouch (I renamed it for Apple!) I will have 3 1/2&quot; (yes, an extra inch does matter) that is a 40% increase in screen size.

I must disagree 98% about the fact that the PDA market is dead.  Firstly, the iPod Phone is a PDA by definition.  Also, Palm (still my favorite) is releasing new units on a regular basis.  Plus, HP just announced another round of Pocket PC connected PDAs.  

[I also agree with Dax, no moving parts is a good thing for battery, heat and reliability]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jake, thanks for this article, you hit it right on the nose &#8211; this is a PDA.  I have to say that the iPod touch is exactly what I have been wanting for several reasons.</p>
<p>1) As a web (and mobile-web) developer I am always running my websites on different devices for testing and development.</p>
<p>2) Being able to use the iPhone interface without having to get a new Cingular contract is awesome (I am still in a 2-year contract with Verizon).</p>
<p>3) I have a 30GB iPod Video and is it about 75% full (15% of that videos).  I have never really liked watching videos on the 2 1/2&#8243; screen with the iTouch (I renamed it for Apple!) I will have 3 1/2&#8243; (yes, an extra inch does matter) that is a 40% increase in screen size.</p>
<p>I must disagree 98% about the fact that the PDA market is dead.  Firstly, the iPod Phone is a PDA by definition.  Also, Palm (still my favorite) is releasing new units on a regular basis.  Plus, HP just announced another round of Pocket PC connected PDAs.  </p>
<p>[I also agree with Dax, no moving parts is a good thing for battery, heat and reliability]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew J</title>
		<link>http://www.communityguy.com/1022/ipod-touch-nothing-to-do-with-an-ipod/comment-page-1/#comment-35638</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew J</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 12:11:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communityguy.com/1022/ipod-touch-nothing-to-do-with-an-ipod/#comment-35638</guid>
		<description>Jake, thanks for this article, you hit it right on the nose - this is a PDA.  I have to say that the iPod touch is exactly what I have been wanting for several reasons.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;1) As a web (and mobile-web) developer I am always running my websites on different devices for testing and development.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;2) Being able to use the iPhone interface without having to get a new Cingular contract is awesome (I am still in a 2-year contract with Verizon).&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;3) I have a 30GB iPod Video and is it about 75% full (15% of that videos).  I have never really liked watching videos on the 2 1/2&quot; screen with the iTouch (I renamed it for Apple!) I will have 3 1/2&quot; (yes, an extra inch does matter) that is a 40% increase in screen size.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;I must disagree 98% about the fact that the PDA market is dead.  Firstly, the iPod Phone is a PDA by definition.  Also, Palm (still my favorite) is releasing new units on a regular basis.  Plus, HP just announced another round of Pocket PC connected PDAs.  &lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;[I also agree with Dax, no moving parts is a good thing for battery, heat and reliability]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jake, thanks for this article, you hit it right on the nose &#8211; this is a PDA.  I have to say that the iPod touch is exactly what I have been wanting for several reasons.</p>
<p>1) As a web (and mobile-web) developer I am always running my websites on different devices for testing and development.</p>
<p>2) Being able to use the iPhone interface without having to get a new Cingular contract is awesome (I am still in a 2-year contract with Verizon).</p>
<p>3) I have a 30GB iPod Video and is it about 75% full (15% of that videos).  I have never really liked watching videos on the 2 1/2&#8243; screen with the iTouch (I renamed it for Apple!) I will have 3 1/2&#8243; (yes, an extra inch does matter) that is a 40% increase in screen size.</p>
<p>I must disagree 98% about the fact that the PDA market is dead.  Firstly, the iPod Phone is a PDA by definition.  Also, Palm (still my favorite) is releasing new units on a regular basis.  Plus, HP just announced another round of Pocket PC connected PDAs.  </p>
<p>[I also agree with Dax, no moving parts is a good thing for battery, heat and reliability]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dax Davis</title>
		<link>http://www.communityguy.com/1022/ipod-touch-nothing-to-do-with-an-ipod/comment-page-1/#comment-2658</link>
		<dc:creator>Dax Davis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 11 Sep 2007 03:27:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.communityguy.com/1022/ipod-touch-nothing-to-do-with-an-ipod/#comment-2658</guid>
		<description>I tell you, I&#039;m a bit disappointed about the file size, but I guess it&#039;s a necessity considering the screens battery usage.  To add the movable parts of a hard drive to the drain, would likely be too much.

Dax</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I tell you, I&#8217;m a bit disappointed about the file size, but I guess it&#8217;s a necessity considering the screens battery usage.  To add the movable parts of a hard drive to the drain, would likely be too much.</p>
<p>Dax</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
