Browse > Home / Business Strategy / Industry maturity brings different challenges

| Subcribe via RSS

Industry maturity brings different challenges

December 7th, 2007 Posted in Business Strategy

blogcouncil.jpg

My buddy Andy has launched a new project this week called the Blog Council. From the announcement press release:

The Blog Council, a professional community of top global brands dedicated to promoting best practices in corporate blogging, officially launched today. [...] The Blog Council exists as a forum for executives to meet one another in a private, vendor-free environment and share tactics, offer advice based on past experience, and develop standards-based best practices as a model for other corporate blogs.

Let’s recap: A community of professionals with similar challenges has formed in order to help support each other through new, sometimes troubling waters. They’ve chosen to do so behind closed doors. Then the blogosphere goes batshit, telling them they’re clueless and “just don’t get it”.

Uh… is it just me or does that reaction back up the need for a private group? Reminds me of the “Jackass Guy” from Happy Gilmore

The thing that irritates me the most (besides the lack of understanding about what people are bashing) is that the high level of zealotry being shown. The “experts” are basically saying it’s their way or the highway, either you make public everything or you do nothing. There are plenty of instances where crucial conversations happens behind closed doors, and for good reason.

I’ve personally been part of a number of product innovation projects that brought customers into the company (Mindstorms NXT, in particular) under strong Non-Disclosure Agreements. I’ve had a number of social media/community “experts” tell me that these projects could/should have been totally out in the open, having no idea what the internal, market, legal, or business implications of that would have been. They were absolutely convinced that the same impact could have happened if everything was public, and they were dead wrong.

As bloggers/social media advocates, it’s not our right or our responsibility to “require” that companies open every conversation, every decision, every business process to our review. The more we demand they do so, the more we come across as the Jackass Guy in Happy Gilmore.

Promoting a culture of openness and transparency is fantastic – I do it daily. But the zealotry shown from the blogosphere about the private nature of the Blog Council does nothing more than distort our message. It proves to companies that participation with customers is scary, that they need to be careful, that they need to watch their backs. When social media was first being introduced into organizations, strong personalities like Robert Scoble were driving that charge. But now that we’ve reached (passed?) a tipping point where the non-bulldog personalities are getting involved, our tactics have to change. For those professionals getting involved with bringing social media to their organizations, we need to welcome not insult. We need to hug, not kick in the ass. We need to let them start in a comfortable place and help them (quickly) move out of their comfort zone.

The biggest challenge to changing corporate culture is eliminating this response from clients/colleagues:

“Oh, well you just aren’t understanding the business issues at play here.”

Getting up in arms because a group of people who are already immersed in social media want to get together in private, comfortable to place to exchange ideas in a non-threatening way just makes all of us look immature and clueless.

Dave, Scoble, TechCrunch, Des, Geoff, Shel, Kami, Mack, David, and Josh also weigh in on the issue.


  • Kevin- first off, thanks for the comment. But let me point out that, unfortunately, you've fallen victim to either incomplete attention to the details or have gotten suckered into the rumors going around. From their site:

    ---
    8. Are you trying to 'regulate' or 'police' the blogosphere?
    Absolutely not. The Blog Council is a peer community where we learn from each other. We have no intention of creating policy or regulating anyone. The opposite is actually the case ... we help companies learn to work with the existing standards of blog ethics set by the free and open blogosphere.
    ---

    So they're not trying to *define* standards, they're trying to *understand how to implement* them. This really isn't any different than the group of industry buddies I sometimes get together with to discuss my business, work/life balance, problem clients/vendors, etc.

    But as far as Dan Greenburg being an example... I'd wholeheartedly disagree. Dan is a shill, a hack, and borderline immoral. Whether he shared his tactics or not, they were out of line. Assuming that anything that goes on behind closed doors equates to "Dan Greenburgism"is far too cynical an approach to life, at least for me.

    Thanks again for the discussion!
  • Perhaps the collective reaction was a bit over the top, but you can at least understand the basis for that reaction: a basic distrust of the manipulative nature of corporate marketing. The assumption generated by announcing a cooperative, private council dedicated to sharing strategy and setting standards is that the outcome will be a collusive technique to persuade consumers that won't work if the consumer know about it. Even if that outcome proves to be something different, the blog council now has to reality of that perception.

    On the one hand, keeping the conversation protected from public scrutiny is wise - Dan Greenberg is the poster child for that argument. On the other hand, the fact that what Greenberg describes is possibly common practice is reason to be more transparent and authentic.

    Perhaps the biggest mistake is in announcing the council in the first place. What was to be gained from that unless the point was to make it transparent?
  • Good points, Jake.

    But would you like to join me in my paranoia?

    http://canuckflack.com/2007/12/07/a-blog-counci...
blog comments powered by Disqus