<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: SXSW: Kids on the Web</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communityguy.com/123/sxsw-kids-on-the-web/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communityguy.com/123/sxsw-kids-on-the-web/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 27 Jul 2010 02:08:38 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.communityguy.com/123/sxsw-kids-on-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-98</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 12:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antseyeview.com/communityguy.com/?p=123#comment-98</guid>
		<description>I heard a similar discussion on churches not too long ago. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;It basically went along the lines of how we&#039;ve gone, originally, from a word-of-mouth culture with no media, where the story was the main thing. Then we moved into print, where the written word was the thing. Then we moved into broadcast, where sounds and pictures and TVs and movies and radio were the things, and now we&#039;re in the interactive age, where the web and all that implies is the thing. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;The most interesting point was that most of our parents were raised in the broadcast age, and with that comes an expectation to be entertained: TV shows entertain, radio entertains, and even churches &quot;entertain&quot; in the sense that one person speaks, a few people sing, but it&#039;s all done on a stage and the crowd sits and watches. &lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;But that won&#039;t interest people in the very near future. We are starting to expect to interact. And as long as churches or schools or anything else demands more of a &quot;broadcast generation&quot; approach (show up and we&#039;ll show you something) over an interactive approach (here&#039;s a topic - what do you think?), we&#039;ll be beating a dead horse, cuz kids aren&#039;t thinking in those terms any more. 
		
			

			
		
		
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard a similar discussion on churches not too long ago. </p>
<p>It basically went along the lines of how we&#8217;ve gone, originally, from a word-of-mouth culture with no media, where the story was the main thing. Then we moved into print, where the written word was the thing. Then we moved into broadcast, where sounds and pictures and TVs and movies and radio were the things, and now we&#8217;re in the interactive age, where the web and all that implies is the thing. </p>
<p>The most interesting point was that most of our parents were raised in the broadcast age, and with that comes an expectation to be entertained: TV shows entertain, radio entertains, and even churches &#8220;entertain&#8221; in the sense that one person speaks, a few people sing, but it&#8217;s all done on a stage and the crowd sits and watches. </p>
<p>But that won&#8217;t interest people in the very near future. We are starting to expect to interact. And as long as churches or schools or anything else demands more of a &#8220;broadcast generation&#8221; approach (show up and we&#8217;ll show you something) over an interactive approach (here&#8217;s a topic &#8211; what do you think?), we&#8217;ll be beating a dead horse, cuz kids aren&#8217;t thinking in those terms any more.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Brett</title>
		<link>http://www.communityguy.com/123/sxsw-kids-on-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-36175</link>
		<dc:creator>Brett</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 11:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antseyeview.com/communityguy.com/?p=123#comment-36175</guid>
		<description>I heard a similar discussion on churches not too long ago. &lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;It basically went along the lines of how we&#039;ve gone, originally, from a word-of-mouth culture with no media, where the story was the main thing. Then we moved into print, where the written word was the thing. Then we moved into broadcast, where sounds and pictures and TVs and movies and radio were the things, and now we&#039;re in the interactive age, where the web and all that implies is the thing. &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;The most interesting point was that most of our parents were raised in the broadcast age, and with that comes an expectation to be entertained: TV shows entertain, radio entertains, and even churches &quot;entertain&quot; in the sense that one person speaks, a few people sing, but it&#039;s all done on a stage and the crowd sits and watches. &lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;But that won&#039;t interest people in the very near future. We are starting to expect to interact. And as long as churches or schools or anything else demands more of a &quot;broadcast generation&quot; approach (show up and we&#039;ll show you something) over an interactive approach (here&#039;s a topic - what do you think?), we&#039;ll be beating a dead horse, cuz kids aren&#039;t thinking in those terms any more. &lt;br&gt;		&lt;br&gt;			&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;			&lt;br&gt;		&lt;br&gt;		&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I heard a similar discussion on churches not too long ago. </p>
<p>It basically went along the lines of how we&#8217;ve gone, originally, from a word-of-mouth culture with no media, where the story was the main thing. Then we moved into print, where the written word was the thing. Then we moved into broadcast, where sounds and pictures and TVs and movies and radio were the things, and now we&#8217;re in the interactive age, where the web and all that implies is the thing. </p>
<p>The most interesting point was that most of our parents were raised in the broadcast age, and with that comes an expectation to be entertained: TV shows entertain, radio entertains, and even churches &#8220;entertain&#8221; in the sense that one person speaks, a few people sing, but it&#8217;s all done on a stage and the crowd sits and watches. </p>
<p>But that won&#8217;t interest people in the very near future. We are starting to expect to interact. And as long as churches or schools or anything else demands more of a &#8220;broadcast generation&#8221; approach (show up and we&#8217;ll show you something) over an interactive approach (here&#8217;s a topic &#8211; what do you think?), we&#8217;ll be beating a dead horse, cuz kids aren&#8217;t thinking in those terms any more. </p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.communityguy.com/123/sxsw-kids-on-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-97</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 10:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antseyeview.com/communityguy.com/?p=123#comment-97</guid>
		<description>Good points from the panel. I think that it boils down to parents needing to develop a strong mix between oversight and control, (supervised) freedom to explore and offline values and guidance to teach lessons that apply to both the offline and online worlds. Interesting things to think about as child-rearing has become a bit more complex than in the &#039;old days&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points from the panel. I think that it boils down to parents needing to develop a strong mix between oversight and control, (supervised) freedom to explore and offline values and guidance to teach lessons that apply to both the offline and online worlds. Interesting things to think about as child-rearing has become a bit more complex than in the &#8216;old days&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sunny Smith</title>
		<link>http://www.communityguy.com/123/sxsw-kids-on-the-web/comment-page-1/#comment-36174</link>
		<dc:creator>Sunny Smith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Mar 2007 09:57:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antseyeview.com/communityguy.com/?p=123#comment-36174</guid>
		<description>Good points from the panel. I think that it boils down to parents needing to develop a strong mix between oversight and control, (supervised) freedom to explore and offline values and guidance to teach lessons that apply to both the offline and online worlds. Interesting things to think about as child-rearing has become a bit more complex than in the &#039;old days&#039;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good points from the panel. I think that it boils down to parents needing to develop a strong mix between oversight and control, (supervised) freedom to explore and offline values and guidance to teach lessons that apply to both the offline and online worlds. Interesting things to think about as child-rearing has become a bit more complex than in the &#8216;old days&#8217;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
