6 types of social networking users
The Guardian reports on a new report commissioned by MySpace. The report is called “MySpace 08: People. Content. Culture.” and I’ll be damned if I can find a trace of the actual report online anywhere.
An extensive social networking research project commissioned by MySpace has identified a host of emerging trends and tribes that the website says have previously gone undetected by the mainstream.
The biggest takeaway is the 6 social networking user archetypes that the report comes away with:
Netrepreneurs:
People who accessed the sites for the sole purpose of making money (4%).
Connectors:
People who revel in passing on information and links whenever they come across something they find interesting (10%).
Transumers:
People who follow the lead of others and join groups connected to their hobbies (28%).
Collaborators:
People who use social networking sites to create events (5%).
Essentialists:
People who use social networking sites to stay in touch with friends and family (38%).
Scene Breaking:
People who hunt down new bands and talent online and share that through the site (5%).
Nothing necessarily “new” here, but certainly lends value to the 90-9-1 theory.
Related Entries
- Breaking the Web…?
- Internet users want to be heard
- Graduating Facebook University
- OCRN: The Online Community Marketing, Growth and Engagement Report
- Social Media Challenge: Telling a life story
3 Responses to “6 types of social networking users”
Meh. I’m with Melanie on this one — I suspect people tend to be a little bit of many of those points — personally, I’d consider myself everything except scene-breaking.
What I’d prefer to see is more, better tools to help marketers reach these communities in a relevant way. And *then* I’d like to see reports like these. As a PR professional, this information is only marginally useful without the means to quickly and efficiently make use of it.
Sorry, the comment form is closed at this time.








So what kind are you? My guess is that it would be hard for those of us in the industry to classify ourselves as one or the other. I suspect it’s an amalgamation of at least three.