"Connected by Distance": Share your community stories

Social Media and Special Effects

Picture 7.png

On the way to see “Wanted” last weekend, I ran into some friends. I mentioned I was going to see the movie and they shared that they had recently seen it. My friends didn’t really dig the movie, mainly because they thought it was more than a little plot stretch. (And it was - I loved the movie, in a suspend every bit of reality there is and just have good time sorta way)

When I walked out of the movie, I was struck by something my friends had said:

“The special effects were supposed to be fantastic, but I didn’t really think much of them.”

To be clear, Wanted had some amazing effects and some fantastic design style to it. So why did my friends not think much of them? Because as frequent moviegoers, they’ve seen the effects before. While they were great, well-done and relevant to the plot they were inventing a new Bullet Time or adding virtual Clone Troopers en masse, they were still very impressive.

The exchange reminded me of the conversation our echo chamber has been having about whether blog comments are dead or whether Twitter is uninteresting or any range of other “too cool for school” arguments.

More and more I’m seeing two things are true, whether in relation to special effects or social media adoption:

If you ever find yourself wondering if you are ahead of the curve (vs. normal users), you just answered your question.


Related Entries

Trackbacks

close Reblog this comment
blog comments powered by Disqus