Browse > Home / Business Strategy / YouTube Ruling: Dead Wrong

| Subcribe via RSS

YouTube Ruling: Dead Wrong

July 9th, 2008 Posted in Business Strategy

Viacom sues YouTube over copyright infringement claims. Viacom demands that YouTube dump data about their users to help Viacom prove their case. The court upholds Viacom’s request.

NEW YORK/SAN FRANCISCO (Reuters) – A U.S. judge’s order to Google Inc to turn over YouTube user data to Viacom Inc sparked an outcry on Thursday from privacy advocates in the midst of a legal showdown over video piracy.

Viacom, owner of movie studio Paramount and MTV Networks, requested the information as part of its $1 billion copyright infringement lawsuit against the popular online video service and its deep-pocketed parent, Google.

Judge Louis Stanton of the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of New York ordered Google on Tuesday to turn over as evidence a database with usernames of YouTube viewers, what videos they watched when, and users’ computer addresses.

This bothers me to my core. But hey, Viacom is going to keep it on the up and up. They pinky swear.

Viacom responded in a statement that it needs the data to demonstrate video piracy patterns that are the heart of its case against YouTube. But it sought to diffuse privacy fears, saying it had no interest in identifying individual users.

“Viacom has not asked for and will not be obtaining any personally identifiable information of any user,” Viacom said.

“Any information that we or our outside advisors obtain … will be used exclusively for the purpose of proving our case against YouTube and Google (and) will be handled subject to a court protective order and in a highly confidential manner.”

The ways this is wrong makes my head spin.


  • carri
    Privacy is definitely slipping. People need to pay attention. However, they are too busy watching babies laugh and people lip sync to pop songs to even care. Ahh, the irony.
  • Jake:
    Investors should run as fast as they can from any industry that can only survive (forget thrive) by suing its customers. The contrast to Zappo's is startling. Moving forward by joyfully engaging both customers and employees vs. hanging on by fingernails to the past. Which would any sane investor choose?

    And thanks so much for the Zappo's post - it has made me want to go buy shoes!
    Hildy
blog comments powered by Disqus