Browse > Home / Building Community / What is community?

| Subcribe via RSS

What is community?

February 28th, 2005 Posted in Building Community

What is "community"? As a community development professional, this is a question that comes up often. I often have conversations with colleagues, industry friends, and other business people about what this means.

People often think that blogs, forums, wikis, and other tools are community. In actuality, those tools are just that – tools. They can help you to build community, but they aren’t actually "community". When we talk community, we’re simply talking about an interaction, a connection. Blogs or forums are a way to initiate and sustain that interaction.

Several years back, I was on a team at work that helped to define the community development/support strategy for the company. We needed to develop a clear, agreed upon definition of what "community" meant, at least to us. I did a ton of research to find what others in the industry and around the Web were using a definition. By far the closest thing we came to a real definition was Derek Powazek’s version from his incredible book Design for Community (which if you haven’t read, you should … today!). We tweak, poked, prod, pulled, and shaped all this new found knowledge, as well as our own brainstorming into the definition below.

What do you think?

A community is a group of people who form relationships over time by interacting regularly around shared experiences, which are of interest to all of them for varying individual reasons.

 

Group
A group can be 2 or more people.  Most, if not all, communities will change and evolve as they are subject to growth or reduction. During these processes, they may destabilize, or turn into a very different type of community. As such, the number of people involved can make a huge difference for the character of the community and the kinds of relationships and interactions that form.

 

Relationships

Relationships in this context can vary greatly depending on the community. They can be very deep, long-term relationships, or much looser relationships. Basically, some bond has to form between members of the group described above. And like any relationship, as the group evolves (and grows and shrinks) this relationship will continue to change.

 

This word "relationship" is key to any discussion of community.

 

Over time

Relationships can form over time either forward or backwards. You can form relationships in a community because of prospective reasons (I want to get involved with these people) or retrospective reasons (I have a long-standing connection to these people).

 

Interacting

The most common forms of interaction in a community involve some form of communication or expression, such as showcasing LEGO creations, dropping an email to say hi, or working together on organizing an offline event. Additionally, interaction doesn’t necessarily include the entire community all the time.

 

These interactions lead to the forming of relationship bonds, described above. They can be formed using any number of tools, including email, IM, phone, snail mail, in person meetings, blogs, WIKIs, etc. Sometimes these interactions happen for the entire community to participate in, such as a discussion board thread in a web community. But very often, these “full community” interactions are driving smaller group, more personal interactions.

 

Regularly

Community must come together in some form on a ongoing basis. Regularly doesn’t assume that this interaction is on a set schedule, but rather that there is or will be interaction at some point in the future and/or has been at some point in the past. It’s nearly impossible to form a relationship, after all, if you never see or talk to the other person/people.

 

Object

What makes community more than a simple group of people is that they are drawn together around some object. This object can be physical, virtual, theoretical, or philosophical; a political ideal, a celebrity, a musical genre, a hobby, a type of car, a neighborhood, a sport.

 

Individual (reasons)

While community members are drawn together around a single object, they are drawn there for a variety of very personal reasons. We may both love LEGO bricks, but I may love it because I love to build, while you love it because you’re a collector of old LEGO sets. Some reasons are emotional; others are more abstract or intellectual. Some have to do more with relationships that form in a community, others with the object of interest.

 

Each member of the community group has their own reason – or more likely reasons – for joining and being part of a particular community.

 


  • I suspect a community is a group of people who combine selfish motives for the common good.
  • I *generally* like the definition, but I think it's missing or minimizing a couple vital things.


    (1) A sense of place, or in more intimate circumstances, a sense of home. Maybe that's what you're hinting at with "shared experiences", but that's the one bit you chose not to emphasize... to me, that's the part that needs the most emphasis.



    To steal a quote from myself:



    "A community is often difficult to really join. It has rules that can be enforced, and occasionally cheated. It means something to its denizens... they're invested in it, via cash, sweat or time. It isn't entirely self-organizing, because it requires some form of leadership to give it direction. It feels like a territory worth defending, if necessary."



    (2) A sense of history. A community is a place that feels like it's been around for a while. The place has a backstory that you want to discover.
  • Oh, for cryin' out loud...


    Sorry, Jake, but I kept getting a "your post has been rejected" pop-up. And I believed it, because you have got the most unbelievably hard to read CAPTCHA I've seen.



    Again, my apologies for the deluge of duplicates. This is what happens when I pay too much attention to error messages. :D
  • Lee
    I think your's is one of the best I've seen Jake. One thing I really get stuck on is interaction and community membership. I agree that there has to be interaction for there to be community- the interaction is where the connections are made.


    However, I keep thinking about the people who aren't interacting with the community directly- the "lurkers".



    I'm curious, if by building a definition around interaction, it excludes those who do not interact with the community, but count themselves as a member?



    I do think interaction should be part of the definition and I'm thinking that the individual who counts themselves as a member, but does not express it interactively, could be a part of the definition too.



    Does interaction = community membership?



    I ask that a bit rhetorically... and having not thought it through much myself.




  • This meme is an interesting one to me. I find myself appreciative of what is affirmed in the various ways of describing community. However, at the same time, I find that it is symptomatic of the problems identified by Robert Putnam in his Bowling Alone. These communities are really affinity groups, not communities of people who have a shared commitment to one another. We may like each other, want only good things to happen to each other, share a common interest together, are willing to invest time and thought in pursuit of ideas, yet I really don't know or am known at any depth by those online.
    Am I expecting too much from online interaction? Probably.

    Am I expecting too much from human interaction, period? I don't think so.



    The highest ideals of community involve classical ideas like loyalty, sacrifice, trust, respect, and unconditional commitment.



    Can these ideals be developed in online communities? That is the question I'd like to see answered. I hope so.
  • This meme is an interesting one to me. I find myself appreciative of what is affirmed in the various ways of describing community. However, at the same time, I find that it is symptomatic of the problems identified by Robert Putnam in his Bowling Alone. These communities are really affinity groups, not communities of people who have a shared commitment to one another. We may like each other, want only good things to happen to each other, share a common interest together, are willing to invest time and thought in pursuit of ideas, yet I really don't know or am known at any depth by those online.
    Am I expecting too much from online interaction? Probably.

    Am I expecting too much from human interaction, period? I don't think so.



    The highest ideals of community involve classical ideas like loyalty, sacrifice, trust, respect, and unconditional commitment.



    Can these ideals be developed in online communities? That is the question I'd like to see answered. I hope so.
  • 'A' community is a thing, as in the 'Internet Community'; whereas community, the quality, is the sum of all the parts of a sustained and sustainable living system. For example the communinty of my own being consists of many billions of cells, some of which are my body, some of which live on my body. They all work together to be me. That 'me' is sustained by the community of Earth, comprising land, sea, rivers, air, etc., which in turn is sustained by Universe.


    The common feature or quality thoughout each layer of community described above, and as bio-diversity science shows, is the inclusive quality, thus inclusivity is community. Exclusivity is a therefore denial of community, or a limitation community.
  • emen
    hahahahaha
  • Kristina
    A community is a DIVERSE group of people which are driven by passion for a common cause in life. This passion is not self-centred but is oblivous of ownership, status and power.


    The community is a social construct and as with every community it comes with a strong set of values and belief systems, epitomised by the language (lingo)of the community.



    The community engages in symbolic and metaphoric dialogue in their communication to insiders and plain language in the discussion with outsiders...creating a clear border line between what is in, out and inbetween.



    Community expansion is therefore contingent upon semiotic and symbolic acceptance of community means of expressions.



    Kristina

    Community fan and creative LEGO user.
  • timothy
    There is one key word which i belive is missing from your definition - BELONGING. A community, unlike a public, has to do with belonging, it?s a group of people who belong to one another and to their place. Simone Weil observed in The Need for Roots: ?The effective exercise of a right springs not from the individual who possesses it, but from other men who consider themselves as being under a certain obligation to him.? Belonging occurs for a variey of reasons and durations but is essential to the sense of community.

  • Very nice site.

    vajinas enormes galerias*

    [URL=http://flicka-kraka.info/rar-arsle-bmp/rar-arsle-bmp.html]rar arsle bmp[/URL]*

    http://sesso-vacca.info/fotografia-transex.html







blog comments powered by Disqus