<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: More SXSW randomness</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.communityguy.com/785/more-sxsw-randomness/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.communityguy.com/785/more-sxsw-randomness/</link>
	<description></description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 20 Mar 2010 08:26:22 -0600</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Miles Sims</title>
		<link>http://www.communityguy.com/785/more-sxsw-randomness/comment-page-1/#comment-569</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles Sims</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 16:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antseyeview.com/communityguy.com/?p=785#comment-569</guid>
		<description>Jake - was great meeting you @ SXSW.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;Your comment about the panelists is interesting. I think a number of then seemed put-off to answer questions at times.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;A lot of the panels this year were about business and starting up it was interesting to see that many of the panelists didn&#039;t have a clear answer to questions regarding their success. Not sure if it was hard for them to articulate it or if they weren&#039;t really sure why they had been successful.&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
		
			

			
		
		
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jake &#8211; was great meeting you @ SXSW.</p>
<p>Your comment about the panelists is interesting. I think a number of then seemed put-off to answer questions at times.</p>
<p>A lot of the panels this year were about business and starting up it was interesting to see that many of the panelists didn&#8217;t have a clear answer to questions regarding their success. Not sure if it was hard for them to articulate it or if they weren&#8217;t really sure why they had been successful.</p>
<p></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Miles Sims</title>
		<link>http://www.communityguy.com/785/more-sxsw-randomness/comment-page-1/#comment-36550</link>
		<dc:creator>Miles Sims</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 22 Mar 2006 14:24:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://antseyeview.com/communityguy.com/?p=785#comment-36550</guid>
		<description>Jake - was great meeting you @ SXSW.&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;Your comment about the panelists is interesting. I think a number of then seemed put-off to answer questions at times.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;A lot of the panels this year were about business and starting up it was interesting to see that many of the panelists didn&#039;t have a clear answer to questions regarding their success. Not sure if it was hard for them to articulate it or if they weren&#039;t really sure why they had been successful.&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;/br&gt;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jake &#8211; was great meeting you @ SXSW.</p>
<p>Your comment about the panelists is interesting. I think a number of then seemed put-off to answer questions at times.</p>
<p>A lot of the panels this year were about business and starting up it was interesting to see that many of the panelists didn&#39;t have a clear answer to questions regarding their success. Not sure if it was hard for them to articulate it or if they weren&#39;t really sure why they had been successful.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
