Browse > Home / Archive: February 2005

| Subcribe via RSS

What is community?

February 28th, 2005 | Comments | Posted in Building Community

What is "community"? As a community development professional, this is a question that comes up often. I often have conversations with colleagues, industry friends, and other business people about what this means.

People often think that blogs, forums, wikis, and other tools are community. In actuality, those tools are just that – tools. They can help you to build community, but they aren’t actually "community". When we talk community, we’re simply talking about an interaction, a connection. Blogs or forums are a way to initiate and sustain that interaction.

Several years back, I was on a team at work that helped to define the community development/support strategy for the company. We needed to develop a clear, agreed upon definition of what "community" meant, at least to us. I did a ton of research to find what others in the industry and around the Web were using a definition. By far the closest thing we came to a real definition was Derek Powazek’s version from his incredible book Design for Community (which if you haven’t read, you should … today!). We tweak, poked, prod, pulled, and shaped all this new found knowledge, as well as our own brainstorming into the definition below.

What do you think?

A community is a group of people who form relationships over time by interacting regularly around shared experiences, which are of interest to all of them for varying individual reasons.

 

Group
A group can be 2 or more people.  Most, if not all, communities will change and evolve as they are subject to growth or reduction. During these processes, they may destabilize, or turn into a very different type of community. As such, the number of people involved can make a huge difference for the character of the community and the kinds of relationships and interactions that form.

 

Relationships

Relationships in this context can vary greatly depending on the community. They can be very deep, long-term relationships, or much looser relationships. Basically, some bond has to form between members of the group described above. And like any relationship, as the group evolves (and grows and shrinks) this relationship will continue to change.

 

This word "relationship" is key to any discussion of community.

 

Over time

Relationships can form over time either forward or backwards. You can form relationships in a community because of prospective reasons (I want to get involved with these people) or retrospective reasons (I have a long-standing connection to these people).

 

Interacting

The most common forms of interaction in a community involve some form of communication or expression, such as showcasing LEGO creations, dropping an email to say hi, or working together on organizing an offline event. Additionally, interaction doesn’t necessarily include the entire community all the time.

 

These interactions lead to the forming of relationship bonds, described above. They can be formed using any number of tools, including email, IM, phone, snail mail, in person meetings, blogs, WIKIs, etc. Sometimes these interactions happen for the entire community to participate in, such as a discussion board thread in a web community. But very often, these “full community” interactions are driving smaller group, more personal interactions.

 

Regularly

Community must come together in some form on a ongoing basis. Regularly doesn’t assume that this interaction is on a set schedule, but rather that there is or will be interaction at some point in the future and/or has been at some point in the past. It’s nearly impossible to form a relationship, after all, if you never see or talk to the other person/people.

 

Object

What makes community more than a simple group of people is that they are drawn together around some object. This object can be physical, virtual, theoretical, or philosophical; a political ideal, a celebrity, a musical genre, a hobby, a type of car, a neighborhood, a sport.

 

Individual (reasons)

While community members are drawn together around a single object, they are drawn there for a variety of very personal reasons. We may both love LEGO bricks, but I may love it because I love to build, while you love it because you’re a collector of old LEGO sets. Some reasons are emotional; others are more abstract or intellectual. Some have to do more with relationships that form in a community, others with the object of interest.

 

Each member of the community group has their own reason – or more likely reasons – for joining and being part of a particular community.

 

Speaking at WOMMA Summit

February 28th, 2005 | Comments | Posted in Events and Speaking

I submitted an application to be a speaker at the Word Of Mouth Marketing Association (WOMMA) Summit today, and lucked out! Apparently, one of the panels had a member drop out… who also did the same kind of work as me. Great luck on my part, as I was an easy replacement.


So at the end of the month, I’ll be hanging out with some of the smartest marketing people around. I’m very very excited.


 

Blog Business Book Tour

February 28th, 2005 | Comments | Posted in Books, Movies, TV

Todd over at apennyfor.com invited me to participate in the Blog Business Book Tour. Basically the BBBT is a way to help authors and blogs hook up to help promote and discuss new books.


The book I’m reviewing is Naked in the Boardroom by Robin Wolander. I got the book the mail today and I’m going to start reading tonight.


I have a few desires for sharing information about this book with you… hopefully Robin goes for them! With any luck, I’ll get a podcast, question/answer session, and guest blogging here.

Too much transparency?

February 27th, 2005 | Comments | Posted in Building Community

I’m about to say something that’s going to get me kicked out of the “Cool Web Kid’s Club”…. sometimes too much transparency is a bad thing.


As more and more companies, authors, and employees share information about their companies or projects, I have to wonder if this is always a good thing. Certainly transparency is almost always a good thing. Certainly too many companies have absolutely no clue how to actually talk to consumers. I have been thinking about whether to even post this entry for a few days. After all, companies don’t need any reason to stay locked away in their ivory tower – Lord knows they’re finding enough already.


But I do believe that before bloggers started opening their doors to the world, they need to think through the process. It’s basic strategy and planning really.


I listened to an interesting podcast  lately, Seduction and Strip Clubs. The first few were quite interesting – the host basically focuses on how to talk to women, and specifically, how to talk to strippers in strip clubs. Sure, I’m happily married so I’m not looking for tips. But the stories are interesting.


The first few pulled me in, and I discovered that the host is just about to release a book – Seduction Code. In the podcast where I first heard him talking about the book, he was joined by one of his friends. Up to this point, I was thinking that this guy was pretty suave, cultured, and at least fairly sophisticated. But the moment that his friend started talking, the hosts’ credibility started to crumbe. The friend was a hardcore redneck, and his stories made it extremely obvious that the stories the host was telling were a bit questionable.


So I decided to check out the Seduction Code Web site to see if I could find more info about the host.  I found this quote from him:



SEDUCTION CODE has been Broken by a 299 lb man with a birthmark on his face!


Says he will give up his last Jelly donut before he gives up the code !


That fat guy is ME


This was the beginning of the change of my perception of the host. Perhaps this is a fault of my own, but hearing that the author was a 300lb man made me instantly question the validity of his book. Perhaps I’ve gotten sucked into our society’s unrealistic sense of beauty, perhaps I’m more used to thinking of “Seduction Experts” as more like Will Smith in Hitch. Or perhaps I’ve heard too many stories from guys who don’t get a name, phone number, or date, but are convinced teh girl was hot for him.


When I first heard of the book, I thought it would be worthwhile to pick up. (Cool stories, techniques to better woo my wife, what’s no to love??) But that transparency lost the author a sale – I’m not really interested in the book anymore.


You’ll often hear me talk about how (as a company) working with community is a “dating” relationship.  And like dating, you want to ease into the full transparency. Honesty and openness are an absolute requirement. But like dating, if you’re dumping every detail of your personality on the first date, your date is going to run screaming from the room.


Dating has a purpose – to find someone to build a relationship. Corporate community work also has a purpose -  to sell products through improved interaction with consumers. With either dating or community work, sharing too much information too early is simply a huge faux paus, and ruins your ability to achieve  your goals.


Michael recently pointed out the best quote I’ve seen so far about all this:



 ”I’m telling you here and now that you must start thinking relationship ==> reputation ==> revenue as your model of growing income through social markets.”


Let me be 100% clear – this is about how to best present yourself, your company, whatever. It is not the same as traditional, “only show the positives” marketing.


I’ll be writing more about this “dating” concept later in the week. This single idea is the basis for my style of interaction with the communities I work with.

Recently Discovered

February 27th, 2005 | Comments | Posted in Building Community

I’ve recently discovered BlogPulse, brought to us by Intelliseek. What better way to prove the Intelliseek functionality??



BlogPulse
BlogPulse is an automated trend discovery system for blogs and a portal into the blogosphere

Does blogging work?

February 27th, 2005 | Comments | Posted in Blogging/Podcasting

Does blogging work? You tell me

The new Super Bowl?

February 27th, 2005 | Comments | Posted in Uncategorized

Are the Oscars the new Super Bowl when it comes to commercials? I’m watching the Academy Awards as I type this, and have been pleasantly surprised at how good some of the commercials are. About half of them are the standard idiotic trash that we watch every day, but other half are pretty sharp.


Certainly not the Super Bowl audience, but also not the Super Bowl prices…

Tags:

Minor Irritation

February 24th, 2005 | Comments | Posted in Building Community

Late (mid?) last year, StoryCorps launched their project. As they put it:



StoryCorps is a national project to instruct and inspire people to record each others’ stories in sound.


We’re here to help you interview your grandmother, your uncle, the lady who’s worked at the luncheonette down the block for as long as you can remember?anyone whose story you want to hear and preserve.


To start, we’ll be building soundproof recording booths across the country, called StoryBooths. You can use these StoryBooths to record broadcast-quality interviews with the help of a trained facilitator. Our first StoryBooths opened in New York City’s Grand Central Terminal on October 23, 2003, and the oral historian Studs Terkel gave a rousing speech (MP3, 3:52 min.).


We’ve tried to make the experience as simple as possible. We’ll help you figure out what questions to ask. We’ll handle all the technical aspects of the recording. At the end of the hour-long session, you’ll get a copy of your interview on CD. And thanks to the generous contributions of our supporters, all this costs only $10.


Since we want to make sure your story lives on for generations to come, we’ll also add your interview to the StoryCorps Archive, housed at the American Folklife Center at the Library of Congress, which we hope will become nothing less than an oral history of America. (See the press release on the Library of Congress Web site.)


It’s a very cool concept, and the stories are really neat. But I have one irritation with this project, and it really really irritates me. They don’t have an RSS feed. Which means, rather than plugging the RSS url into Doppler and having it work its podcast magic, I have to manually download, add to iTunes, add to the StoryCorps playlist.


I’ve emailed them several times, and even spoken with them on the phone. They seem to be a very nice team, don’t get me wrong. But come on, what’s the hold up? This isn’t remotely difficult technology here! The tech guy I spoke to on the phone was clearly a smart guy. I’m confident he could figure this out.


Come on StoryCorps! Your project is perfect for podcasting!!

Jon Stewart on Bloggers

February 22nd, 2005 | Comments | Posted in Blogging/Podcasting

Funny clip from Jon Stewart on bloggers and blogging!

Don’t we wish they could all be this dedicated?

February 22nd, 2005 | Comments | Posted in Building Community

Disney’s #1 – disneytattooguy.com