Browse > Home /

| Subcribe via RSS

The TSA is blogging

tsa1.jpg

For someone who travels as much as I do, I constantly find myself scratching my head about things like having to remove my shoes, the extra attention paid to 80 year old white women, or the staff of 12 standing around while 3 actually work.

When Matt told me that the TSA had launched a blog, I was excited and intrigued. Would my questions be answered? Would my faith in the TSA be restored? Would I get to see behind the curtains of a fairly private government agency?

Sorta.

I have to first congratulate the TSA for taking this plunge. Getting past the fear of such an endeavor is often a huge step that many organizations can’t actually go through with. The problem, however, is that it’s clearer than clear that the TSA launched the blog without even the slightest hint of strategy and only a minor understanding of what constitutes successful blogging. Here’s a few pointers for the TSA bloggers to improve the experience.

Take a look at your objective
The first round of posts and the hundreds (1308 comments submitted on six entries as I write this) are largely focused on questions from confused travelers. The first entry jumps straight into answering the inevitable travel policy questions. Is the blog the right tool here? I’d argue that a social tool that allows questions to be submitted and voted up by site visitors is a far more interesting idea over a blog.

If the bulk if the content is going to be focused around questions, you can still use the blog format, but the TSA should tweak the design to fit better with that purpose. Serious Eats is a great example of this.

Introduce the team and the objective
A blog is a conversation and the first step in a conversation is an introduction. Before you jump into the content, introduce the concept of the blog, introduce the team members we’ll be hearing from. What do they do? Where do they work? What’s their background? Why is the blog titled “Evolution of Security”?

(I know there’s a Meet the Bloggers link on the sidebar, but a) it doesn’t work, and b) that’s not enough.)

Create an editorial schedule
If the blog is going to focus on obvious content, then create an editorial calendar and publish it or share the general concept with the readers. Should we check back once a week? Every day? I can’t support you if I don’t know what you’re up to.

Know the existing content
The blog can be a great tool for connecting readers to content they wouldn’t normally have found. For instance, in the latest entry on the TSA blog, there’s a discussion of why children and the elderly get the same treatment as more potentially risky travelers. Good stuff, but they didn’t link to the article on the TSA site that already addressed this question.

Find the right personality not the “correct” position
The TSA bloggers posted a video of the TSA Assistant Administrator (what the hell does he do??) answering the question about children and the elderly. I started watching it and fell instantly asleep with a thin line of drool glistening on my chin and my head flopped backwards. Seriously, watch this for yourself and tell me how far you make it.

On paper, this guy probably makes a lot of sense. He’s probably a security guru with years of TSA experience or something. But in practice, this guy hurts the message. He’s completely counter to the voice of the blog. He screams to those of us outside of the TSA “We’re just trying to cover our collective asses!” Find the right person, not the right position for your community. Hell, hire a community manager!

Those suggestions aside, I’d like to give huge kudos to the TSA for their efforts. Sure, I think it would have been fairly obvious to expect a huge reaction, but it’s better to start and have some bumps than not to start at all. They’ve also used Blogger (which is good that they didn’t try to craft their own custom software, but seriously, Blogger? For the TSA?), have RSS feeds, and are modifying the site as they get feedback. And perhaps most importantly, whoever is writing their content is doing a great job. The blog posts are enjoyable if not quite “fun”. I just wish I knew who the writer actually was…

Now let’s see what happens as the TSA team finds their footing. They should be commended for jumping in feet first.

UPDATE: The TSA team responds. Check out the response… it’s a great read.

Tags:

Intelligence Community is getting social

September 8th, 2007 | Comments | Posted in community

CIASpyspace, Spookbook, and MySpy are just few of the names that the blogosphere has been jokingly throwing around about the new CIA DIA “A-Space” project. A-Space, in case you haven’t heard of it yet, is the intelligence community’s first (?) foray into social networking. Lots of ink has been spilled about the project [1] [2] [3] [4], and we’ve seen lots of silly comments about the project, like questions of flirting and dating vs. data analysis improvements.

The Financial Times outlines the project:

The Director of National Intelligence will open the site to the entire intelligence community in December. The move is the latest part of an ongoing effort to transform the analytical business following the failure to detect the 9/11 terrorist attacks or find weapons of mass destruction in Iraq.

Thomas Fingar, the deputy director of national intelligence for analysis, believes the common workspace – a kind of “MySpace for analysts” – will generate better analysis by breaking down firewalls across the traditionally stove-piped intelligence community. He says the technology can also help process increasing amounts of information where the number of analysts is limited.

While it may seem silly, I’d support the idea that this is a brilliant move. We’ve seen (or at least heard about) other moves within the Intel Community (IC) to use more social tools in their work, such as Intellipedia and blogs, so this certainly isn’t the first time they’re going in this direction. Clearly the IC is interested in learning and trying more – just the agenda of this week’s Intelligence and National Security Alliance event. And it’s the right way to go.

Michael Scheuer, the former head of the CIA’s special bin Laden unit, said he had long believed that “90 percent of what you need to know comes from open-source intelligence.”

After 9/11 there seemed to be only one thing that the IC could agree on – that the IC didn’t interact enough with each other. We’ve now heard countless stories about a lack of information sharing between agencies and even departments within agencies. Some of this stems from security concerns, but it seems like even more stems from a lack of (or perhaps interest in) cooperation. That, and as this article states: “The spy agencies were saddled with technology that might have seemed cutting edge in 1995.”

But despite that situation, far from hidden from the world, I’ve read a number of stories with quotes similar to this one:

Speculation is rife that the CIA’s A-Space will also allow spies to swap photos, flirt and throw virtual food at each other.

The running joke is that A-Space is somehow going to be a dating site for spooks. Since I don’t have a Level 40 Security Clearance, I can’t know for sure what the tool will or will not have. That won’t stop me from making a few suggestions/comments about what a potential social networkingesque site(s) for the IC might benefit from!

Create and empower an implementation strategy
One of the most crucial elements to the success of a project of this nature, regardless of sector or industry is the strategy for implementation. This project (as well as similar efforts) are primarily social, not primarily research. A social network, like any other social tool, is based on social connection not data collection. While del.icio.us, for instance, could be consider nothing more than a data resource (bookmarks), it’s the social component that makes it powerful. That social component is driven off of emotion needs and desires, not from logic and stats.

Additionally, this project will need it’s “Cruise Director” (aka Community Manager). Someone empowered to drive usage, encourage participation, and reach out to those involved to connect with them. Perhaps this is already in play (there’s that Level 40 issue again). I sure hope so, because this project is going to struggle against adoption issues just like any other organization going down this path. Here’s a few of the common pain points I suspect the project leaders will hear:

  • “I’m already so busy, I don’t have time for yet another thing to keep up with”
  • “I’m too old for this youth-oriented foolishness”
  • “This is just a toy that will fall by the wayside soon enough”

Don’t shy away from the personal
It may be a joke that people in the IC can swap photos or throw virtual food at each other, but this is actually a fantastic method of building connection between people. These seemingly pointless activities are what often lead to discussions, thoughts, ideas and connections that are major breakthroughs. I just finished reading Merchant of Death and was struck by a story about the value of a BBQ event in the process of attempting to take down the “Lord of War“.

A member of the intelligence community decided to host a Viktor Bout party to acquaint people from different government agencies with each other, given their common interest in the elusive Bout. Several dozen people turned up for the gathering, which took place under the cover of a weekend cookout in a Virgina suburb south of Washington, D.C. THe mood was festive. Spouses and children were invited, and as the burders and hot dogs sizzled in the fading light of dusk, those working on Bout clustered into small groups to discusses the latest developments in their hunt for the arms trafficker. With the NSC interest spearheaded by Wolosky, government resources for the operation had expanded and key policymakers had been won over. To this small but dedicated group that included officials from the CIA, DIA, NSA, NSC, the wind seemed to have shifted in their favor.

“The idea of thirty of forty people showing up on this one issues was remarkable,” said one attendee. “Our spouses had no idea why we were there, but there would be little cliques of people off in the corner who talked about Bout. It was fun.”

Imagine that – doing your job and having it be fun. Fun is a powerful force when shooting for effectiveness. Like Lee asks, “Is your community a party?

Focus on the hunches, not the connections
While connection between people in the IC is going to benefit the IC at large, that’s simply the first step (of about 4,332,756 steps) in making this effort valuable. Bringing the Social Web (even a Top Secret one) to the IC means that you’re creating and maintaining relationships between people-data-activity. Think of the connection as the initial handshake. It’s quick, good manners require it, and it’s an entrance point into something bigger.

The hunches are the key to the IC Social Web – bringing people together in order to provide a positive, effective, quick, smart way to share hunches, ideas, concepts, and gut feels, and insights in a way that yields better intelligence. This isn’t going to happen simply by making the introductions.

Continue to evolve
You often hear horror stories about big organizations (government and private alike) feeling locked into ineffective tools simply because those tools were expensive, or technically/politically difficult to implement. This type of project will absolutely evolve over time, and what works when it launches is not going to work 2 years from now. Project lead Mike Wertheimer, says:

“We are willing to experiment in ways that we have never experimented before”

Fantastic. Just don’t forget that social experiments require time to get on their feet.

Make participation transparent
How can you get busy people to participate in a social project like? Don’t tell them they’re participating! This isn’t the same thing as hiding things from them, it just means make their participation in something inherent in an experience that they’re already doing. Google, for instance, doesn’t rely on overt action of users saying “this is my favorite content”. Instead they rely on behavior that already exists – the creation of links, with each link being a vote. Amazon’s algorithms include not only overt action (rating/review creation, for instance), but also other activities like which pages you look at, which pages other people you match well with looked at, etc.

There is some indication this is already being considered:

A-Space will be equipped with web-based email and software that recommends areas of interest to the user just like Amazon suggests books to its customers. The site will also allow users to create and modify documents, and determine user privileges, in a similar fashion to Google Documents.

Very smart.

This project is a fantastic effort that should be applauded and supported. As this article points out, “Despite the revolutionary technical developments of recent years, people remain the Intelligence Community’s most vital resource.” With a community that includes no fewer than 16 separate agencies, has budgets in the hundreds of billions of dollar, currently employees tens (or hundreds) of thousands of people, and deals with mountains of data daily, I say anything that can help drive smarter connections amongst the analysts is a good thing.

From my discussions with IC insiders, people in different parts of the community, the discussion seems to be mainly the same questions:

  • “What about [pick an agency, but especially DoD, Pentagon, Homeland Security]? They need it more than anybody!”
  • “When can I start using it??”
  • “Where is this concept going? Is it another pet project or does it have serious buy-in?”

Clearly there’s potential, there’s interest, and there’s tech being put in place. Hopefully that all comes with a side order of implementation strategy.

UPDATE: Lewis Sheperd expands the background of the project.

Tags: , ,